You Say Sport - I Say Game

For as long as I have walked on planet earth, the sport versus game debate regularly pops up. David Papineau is the most recent entry into the ongoing debate - at least as it pertains to the Olympics.

While many activities are both games and sports – tennis and golf, for instance – there are also sports that aren’t games – skiing and surfing, say – and games that aren’t sports – snakes and ladders, or chess and bridge, for that matter.

[ Source : Aeon ]

Papineau suggests that to be classified a sport requires a physical exertion. And then to make his point, talks a lot about Chess and Bridge. I get it. But how much ‘physical exertion’?

  • A Formula One Driver ?
  • A Snooker / Pool Player ?
  • A Darts Player ?

I have seen people define sport as being something that has a score associated. The refined with ‘immutable’ score - so excluding (say) ballroom dancing. (BTW, if you watch a real pro you will witness physical exertion.) Personally, I like the definition that a friend of mine provided some years ago.

Any ‘game’ that can be played whilst smoking or drinking during the process is not a sport.

I like the definition, because it automatically removes ‘fishing’ and ‘bowling’, but in truth it really doesn’t work. Consider;

  • I recall seeing a runner in Hyde Park a few years ago, cigarette in one hand, cell phone in the other. Is running no longer a sport ?
  • Pretty much anything associated with Swimming is automatically a sport … trust me - it isn’t.


This Was Originally Posted To Beyond Bridges

The site has been closed down and the material moved to this site for posterity.

The focus today is People First.

If you want to know more - you could do no worse than;

sign up for our newsletter
subscribe to our podcast
and follow our blog
Explore More